Connect with us


No, conservatives shouldn’t quit the Republican Party



No, conservatives shouldn't quit the Republican Party

After losing a national election, it’s natural that a political party goes through a period of soul-searching and internal turmoil.

The Republican Party, though, has taken it to another level.

President Donald Trump brought most of the GOP along for the ride during his outlandish, conspiracy-fueled attempt to overturn the election, ending in the Jan. 6 riot at the US Capitol.

His loyalists have since been scouring the landscape searching for Republicans to censure or primary for insufficient loyalty to Trump during this interlude or his resulting second impeachment.

The most famous Republican House freshman mused not too long ago about a space laser associated with the Rothschilds starting the 2018 California wildfires, forcing an embarrassing debate about whether to sanction her.

And Trump has maintained his hold on the party seemingly effortlessly. He’s been deplatformed by social-media companies and hasn’t done TV interviews, and still, you’d think he were running a highly polished 24/7 political operation, rather than relaxing at Mar-a-Lago.

This dismaying chapter has predictably led to declarations that the party is doomed and calls to split it up.

A former chair of the Washington state GOP wrote in an op-ed in The Seattle Times urging, as the headline put it, “Let’s form a new Republican Party.” He argued that “dissident Republicans could and should band together and partner with the substantial Never Trump community of Republicans who have already left” to form a new political enterprise.

This prompted a Chris Cillizza item at CNN headlined “Should Republicans disband the GOP?”

There’s been a spate of articles by erstwhile Republicans announcing they are done. The former Republican Rep. Mickey Edwards wrote one after Jan. 6 saying he was quitting the party because it has become the “opposite of what it was.”

Jonathan Last wrote a piece in The New Republic titled “The Republican Party is dead. It’s the Trump cult now.” Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker declared, “The party isn’t doomed; it’s dead.”

This seems a mite premature about a party that represents roughly half the country and is on the cusp of a majority in the House, tied 50-50 in the Senate and in control of the governorships in 27 states and both the governorship and state legislature in 22 of those.

If we are going to consider this geographically diverse collection of officeholders — whose careers in many instances predate Trump and will outlast him — a mere personality cult, the word “cult” has lost its meaning.

The fortunes of our political parties ebb and flow and their iterations change over time, but they are robust, deeply embedded institutions of our public life that endure even after electoral disasters and self-sabotaging wrong turns.

As Dan McLaughlin, my colleague at National Review, points out, the Republican Party has since its inception been a fusion of a classical liberal wing with a more populist, elemental conservatism.

As McLaughlin writes, “The party’s ideals were universal, but its culture was Midwestern and Protestant. Early Republicans wanted an even-handed government, but one that reflected their values. Those values — American nationalism, Christian moralism, economic self-reliance, law and order — run throughout the party’s history.”

What’s different about Trump is that he represents the ascendance of the populist wing after it had long been in a subordinate position in the party.

Populism was part of the appeal of Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, John McCain and even the patrician George H.W. Bush in his winning 1988 campaign, but it was easy to miss. Trump’s populism was unmistakable, even as he retained key policy priorities of the traditional GOP, from tax cuts and judges, to religious liberty and abortion.

That said, the party does need to get beyond Trump, who has remained potent despite being a three-time loser now — in the 2018 midterms, in his 2020 reelection campaign, and in the Georgia runoff elections. In electoral terms, “all the winning” stopped circa November 2016.

At this juncture, though, it does feel as though the advent of the post-Trump GOP is coming … approximately never.

But American politics moves quickly. Richard Nixon won a landslide in 1972 and resigned in 1974, leaving the GOP in utter disarray — and yet Reagan won a landslide in 1980. The Tea Party didn’t exist when Barack Obama won an overwhelming victory in 2008, sprang to life almost immediately in 2009, and by 2016 had disappeared, subsumed into the Trump phenomenon.

There will inevitably be an overwhelming controversy in the Biden administration or a crisis that moves us beyond the politics of the Trump presidency and the immediate aftermath.

New issues will emerge, and so will new movements and players on the right. There are plenty of talented, ambitious Republican politicians who think they are better suited to win a presidential election in 2024 and to be president than Donald Trump 2.0. The incentives are for them to continue to keep their heads down and to slipstream behind Trump for now, but that won’t always be true.

The temptation to splinter from the GOP might be alluring to elements of both the populists and the Republican traditionalists, but this a dead end. It’s more realistic that the populists, with the passion and the numbers, could make a go of a new party, but they’d only be ensuring their own defeat and that of the GOP.

The Republican Party is the only plausible electoral vehicle for any sort of right-of-center politics in America. It is worth fighting over, and it will be. That struggle is sure to be toxic and unpredictable, except for the fact that at the end of the day the Grand Old Party will still be standing.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


US gets closer to normalcy — it’s absurd to paint it any other way




US gets closer to normalcy — it's absurd to paint it any other way

New US COVID-19 cases are a quarter what they were six weeks ago, with the daily numbers dropping 15 percent to 25 percent a week. It’s time for the country to start moving rapidly to normalcy — restoring jobs and restoring lives. Caution is still in order, but only that.

Yet President Biden, after vowing the nation will have enough vaccine doses by July’s end to vaccinate every American, just said he only hopes for a return to normal by “next Christmas.” Huh?

“I don’t want to overpromise anything here,” “A year from now,” he told CNN, “I think that there’ll be significantly fewer people having to be socially distanced, having to wear a mask.” That’s not avoiding overpromising, as he claimed: It’s outright telling everyone to expect yet another year of economic and social devastation.

Biden’s chief medical adviser, Anthony Fauci, says the worst of the pandemic “might be” behind us. Yet he’s also telling Americans they’ll need to wear masks (maybe two at a time) at least through 2022 — even if they get vaccinated.

This is absurd: Our leaders should be nonstop pushing reluctant Americans to get jabbed so we can all get on with our lives.

Some point to variants — from Britain, South Africa, Brazil and now New York — as new reason for great concern. But though some of these strains have proven more contagious, none has proven more deadly.

Hospitalizations and deaths keep dropping, even as variants have gained ground: Deaths dropped 20 percent these last two weeks. The UK variant predominates in Britain, Switzerland, Denmark and Israel — and all are also seeing cases dive.

And the drug companies that (thanks to President Donald Trump ripping up red tape) developed life-saving vaccines at lightning speed are already testing updated versions that target the variants, though their “classic vax” still offers high protection against them.

And while America’s vaccination process has rolled out more slowly than it should’ve, it’s still moving inexorably along.

More than 13 percent of Americans have gotten at least one dose, and the majority are health-care workers or those in nursing homes or other high-risk settings.

Add to that the number of us estimated to have already been infected — 35 percent of Los Angeles County and more than half of Miami-Dade County, for example — and you can see why Johns Hopkins prof Marty Makary predicts we’ll have herd immunity by April.

And the most at-risk Americans have gained immunity. Data scientist Youyang Gu estimates that the number of “susceptible” Americans, those over 45 without immunity, has fallen from a third of the country at the start of the year to 10 percent or fewer now.

Cases in nursing homes fell more than 80 percent from late December to early February. When deaths spiked over the holidays, they actually fell at nursing homes.

But it’s the youngest Americans — least at risk of transmitting the virus or suffering badly from it — who must get their lives back immediately. At least 38,000 New York City teachers have been vaccinated, according to City Hall and the United Federation of Teachers.

Perhaps it’s just that normalcy makes it too hard to justify the rush to pass a $1.9 trillion “relief” bill filled with Democrats’ pet projects. We’d rather not think cynical politics is behind Biden’s gloom, but it’s hard to see any other reason he’s denying that the pandemic’s end is staring us in the face.

Continue Reading


NY City Council is pushing for a school-safety disaster




NY City Council is pushing for a school-safety disaster

Some on the City Council aren’t satisfied with Mayor de Blasio’s vow to shift the school-security budget from the NYPD to the Department of Education: They want to pull the safety agents out of schools altogether.  

At a recent hearing, a furious Councilman Daneek Miller (D-Queens) rightly called the idea “absurd.” But Education Committee Chairman Mark Treyger (D-Brooklyn), a former teacher and proud United Federation of Teachers member, loves it — saying the resources should go for more social workers and guidance counselors.

Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, meanwhile, claims the safety agents are an unaccountable force that has committed verbal, physical and sexual abuse of schoolchildren. And Councilwoman Helen Rosenthal (D-Manhattan and a candidate for Manhattan borough president), asked: “Why would we want anyone who is part of a paramilitary organization to be in our schools?”

Paramilitary? The agents are 90 percent black and Hispanic, 70 percent female and 100 percent unarmed — hardly the jack-booted thugs she pretends.

In the 2019-2020 school year, the system logged 288 major felony crimes in schools, ranging from rape to grand larceny, plus 976 other crimes, from assault to petit larceny. Switching to a force of social workers would see crime soar — though maybe not be reported.

Indeed, it’s an argument for keeping the agents firmly under the purview of the NYPD, an unparalleled public safety agency. When the DOE was last responsible for school safety, many school buildings had devolved into war zones.

At hearing, Greg Floyd, head of Teamsters Local 237, which represents the safety agents, noted, “School Safety Agents have been both hero and victim” in their work. They guided students in the evacuation of Stuyvesant HS on 9/11 and “saved a student from a vicious stabbing attack by four rival gang members” outside of a public school.

Action on this bill is likely ,as Council Speaker Corey Johnson — who’s reportedly mulling a run for Comptroller — is a co-sponsor.

Johnson, Williams and others support a “restorative justice” model for school safety that focuses on social and emotional support. The UFT should be using its heft to resist: The steady softening of school discipline codes that has brought a rise in disorder.

Kudos to Councilman Miller and his Queens colleagues Barry Grodenchik and Robert Holden, plus their GOP colleagues Steve Matteo, Joe Borelli and Eric Ulrich, for opposing the lunatic drive to eliminate school safety agents and put students, teachers and other school staff in danger.

Continue Reading


Letters to the Editor — Feb. 28, 2021




Letters to the Editor — Feb. 28, 2021

‘Woke’ school rage
The discriminatory lawsuits reported by the Sunday Post should serve as just the starting point for what deserves to be the largest class-action suit in New York’s history (“ ‘Black’ balled,” Feb. 25).

Every taxpayer (especially the parents of students) who has ever ponied up a dime to support this pathetic, woke-based farce masquerading as a “Department of Education” should not only be refunded in full but be given damage compensation.

The city has failed spectacularly in providing even a trace of a basic education to the vast majority of its students. Discipline in the classroom? “Racist.” Precision and accuracy in writing? “White supremacy.” Standards for excellence? “A colonialist construction.”

One needs look no further than the edicts and aspirations of former Schools Chancellor Richard Carranza and his imbecile boss to see what’s been wrought upon the city’s children and those who sincerely attempt to teach them. Disgraceful.
Anthony Parks
Garden City

Cop attack plea
Our new and enlightened federal administration has offered Urooj Rahman and Colinford Mattis a plea deal (“Van-bombing plea offer,” Feb. 23).

These two are lawyers, officers of the court, and they threw a Molotov cocktail into a police van. Is that not a worse offense than dressing like a Viking and storming the Capitol?

If anyone deserves a long stretch, these two misanthropes do. Left-wing lawyers are not automatically anointed as misguided or innocent. These are violent criminals.
Paul O’Keefe
Union City, NJ

Don’t rely on ‘czar’
So now this hapless moron of a mayor wants to appoint a “recovery czar” to bring the city’s businesses back to life (“Now He Wants To Save City Biz,” Feb. 23).

Once again, too little and very late. Asked why it took so long, Mayor de Blasio cited emergency issues that had to be dealt with first. Since street crime is out of control, the subways are treacherous to set foot in and the vaccine rollout has been a mess, what were the other emergencies he had to take care of?

Of course, the process will contain racial equity aspects that will result in some businesses remaining closed forever. All small businesses need to be helped, not just the ones he deems more important.
Robert DiNardo

No Capitol justice
I am really glad that Miranda Devine is paying attention to the people who stormed the Capitol building on Jan. 6 (“Left has a ‘law & order’ double standard,” Feb. 22).

Yes, it was wrong to do this, but how interesting that an anti-Trump activist who encouraged people to riot and trespassed himself was not only set free without bail but also given $75,000 from CNN for the footage. That is quite a payday.

Attorney General-designate Merrick Garland and President Biden say they will protect us from “white supremacists.” That will come as a great relief to the real terrorists. We are now living in a country where there is no equal protection under the law.
Catherine Adago

Fauci’s follies
Dr. Anthony Fauci says we now need to wear two masks (“Masking may go into 2022,” Feb. 23).

He can’t decide whether grandparents who are vaccinated can visit their grandchildren, and says Americans will be wearing masks until 2022.

Everybody wanted to hear his opinion, even though his opinions keep changing. The damage that following his advice has done is mind-boggling.
John Habersberger
New Paltz

Continue Reading