Connect with us

Opinion

Letters to the Editor — June 9, 2021

Published

on

Letters to the Editor — June 9, 2021

The Issue: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s call to build fewer jails and more hospitals to address crime.

Being childishly naïve is one thing, but being flat-out ignorant of reality is entirely different (“Build hosps, not jails, to cut crime: Ocasio,” June 5).

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is right about building more hospitals — we’re going to need them. We will need a lot more beds to care for the victims of violent crime that AOC and the other “social justice” morons help create with their ridiculous policies and beliefs.

It’s time for the adults to resume governing.

Joseph DeRubeis
Westfield, NJ

Ocasio-Cortez came out with another beauty just the other day. Her message was: Do not build jails.

Of course, with so much violence and crime in New York City, she doesn’t realize that after a murderer or a rapist is caught, the initial step is to confine the person, not to attempt rehabilitation immediately after the culprit is handcuffed.

Public safety is first and foremost, and treating these thugs with care and education isn’t going to go well.

What she intends to accomplish with her erroneous rhetoric is beyond me. Jail is the punishment for the crime.

Ron Zajicek
Cortlandt

Ocasio-Cortez’s plan to replace jails with hospitals will result in hospitals filled with victims of violent crime, perpetrated by thugs who belong in the jails she doesn’t want built.

Her social-justice campaign will hurt people in her Bronx/Queens district, who should vote her out of office when she runs for reelection in 2022.

Richard Reif
Queens

This is possibly the stupidest thing Ocasio-Cortez has ever said. She claims cutting mental-health funds causes violent crime. But Thrive got $1.5 billion and did nothing.

Community groups are a complete scam and only help organizers get rich off taxpayer dollars.

And the height of hypocrisy is that she has private security. She needs to give that up and start taking public transportation alone like the rest of us are forced to do.

Carol Meltzer
Manhattan

The Issue: A psychiatrist who talked about having thoughts of shooting white people during a Yale event.

Psychiatrist Aruna Khilanani has fantasies of shooting and killing any white person who gets in her way (“Yale talk on ‘shooting’ a white person,” June 5).

She also stated that she would have a bounce in her step as she walked away after committing murder. She said white people make her blood boil and they are out of their minds and have been for a long time.

Really? This from a woman who is supposed to be there to help people with mental conditions.

Well, “doctor,” my prescription for you is to go see someone about your anger and homicidal thoughts before you act on them.

Michael Murphy
Mahopac

I was appalled by the racist rant of Khilanani, stating her fantasy of “unloading a revolver into the head of any white person” who got in her way.

She is disgusting, and the fact that she was allowed to spew these vitriolic and hateful rants shows what is wrong with this country.

She should be stripped of her license and barred from ever addressing an audience again in any forum.

Alan Gellerman
Flushing

I’m willing to bet dollars to doughnuts that Khilanani still has use of her Facebook and Twitter accounts, even after fantasizing about killing white people and being happy about it.

Michael Oates
North Arlington, NJ

Want to weigh in on today’s stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to [email protected]. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy and style.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Wuhan lab was batty and other commentary

Published

on

Wuhan lab was batty and other commentary

Pandemic journal: Wuhan Lab Was Batty

Despite the insistence of Peter Daszak — a “longtime partner of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and one of the most staunch and outspoken critics of the lab-leak theory” — the lab “did indeed have live bats within its walls,” reports National Review’s Jim Geraghty. Sky News Australia found May 2017 footage showing caged bats and one “hanging off the hat of” a researcher “wearing a mask and glasses but no other protective head covering.” The lab even “filed patents for bat cages.” Daszak, whose EcoHealth Alliance funneled government grants to the Wuhan lab, deleted tweets claiming it held no live bats but hasn’t “admitted he was wrong.” That lab “had more samples of bat viruses within its walls than any other building on earth,” yet Daszak and others claim the fact COVID originated in Wuhan “is simply coincidental.”

Libertarian: Biden’s Infrastructure Backfire

President Biden is focused on “all the money he plans to spend” on ­infrastructure, rather than on getting the biggest bang for the buck — which suggests he will be buying “a lot less infrastructure” than otherwise, argues Reason’s Christian Britschgi. The prez insists, for example, that jobs go to union workers, yet that could raise costs by as much as 22 percent. His team paused a Houston highway project on civil-rights grounds, possibly opening an “avenue for activists to slow” other projects. And the Bidenites are considering a rollback of Trump-era limits on environmental reviews. In the end, his team’s commitment to “outdated red tape” will “inevitably impede whatever it ends up trying to build.”

Border watch: Migrants’ COVID Threat

President Biden should have at least “waited until the deadly COVID-19 pandemic was over before reversing Trump’s border-security measures,” but he has instead enabled migrants to bring “the virus — including potentially dangerous variants — into the interior of the US,” laments Nolan Rappaport at The Hill. Team Biden excepted unaccompanied alien children from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s temporary order permitting “the rapid expulsion of aliens who would otherwise be held in crowded areas while being processed.” While the coronavirus is “still killing more than 200 people a day in the US,” Biden is admitting newcomers from low-vaccination countries without so much as a COVID test. The president vowed to “follow the science” in fighting the pandemic, and “politicians should keep their campaign promises.”

From the left: Manchin’s Favor to Dems

For all liberals’ rage at Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) “for opposing the For the People Act and for supporting the filibuster,” he may “be doing these liberal Democrats a favor,” contends John Judis at Talking Points Memo. The voting bill is a highly controversial and thus an unpopular “Christmas tree of progressive election measures” that includes “public funding of elections, . . . support for Congress being able to declare the District of Columbia a state and a panoply of regulations that would govern state elections — elections that are supposed to be the purview of states.” Meanwhile, “the presence of the filibuster forces Democrats in the Senate and the Biden administration to focus their efforts on popular economic measures,” since it makes it impossible to pass more culturally divisive ones that would harm the party’s candidates in 2022.

Conservative: Joe’s Smart Strategic Reshoring

Global supply chains have benefited consumers in the form of cheaper prices — but they have also “created new problems,” observes John Steele Gordon at Spectator USA. So kudos to Team Biden, which has “produced an important new report” seeking to address one main downside: America’s dependence on foreign powers for security-sensitive manufacturing needs. “The United States currently relies mostly on ­imports are of particular concern: semiconductors, high-capacity batteries, pharmaceuticals and their active ingredients and critical and strategic materials.” As the early pandemic’s mask shortage showed, “great powers . . . need to be able to produce strategically important products within their own borders.” By recognizing the problem, the Biden report is an important first step.

— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

Continue Reading

Opinion

Benjamin Netanyahu’s reckoning a sour ending for a transformative prime minister

Published

on

Benjamin Netanyahu’s reckoning a sour ending for a transformative prime minister

Benjamin Netanyahu showed the opposite of grace as he exited from power on Sunday.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Letters to the Editor — June 14, 2021

Published

on

Letters to the Editor — June 14, 2021

The Issue: The discussion of law and order at last week’s Democratic debate for mayor.

If any one of these five candidates becomes mayor, it will be the continuation of the de Blasio era (“Crime focus of Dem debate,” June 11).

Many of them are in favor of defunding the Police Department, which is why there is so much crime, and shootings are rising every day.

The people of this city had better wake up when they go to vote. Haven’t we had enough of this? When will it stop? These candidates will not put an end to all this.

Rob Johann

Queens

Thinking that a Republican candidate could not win the mayoral race in New York, I switched my party to Democrat so I could vote.

After listening to all the Democratic candidates during the debate last week, I want to immediately switch my party back to Republican and vote for Curtis Sliwa.

He is our only hope to live in a city that values law and order. He won’t cave to these left-wing zealots who will further destroy our city and our quality of life.

We need a mayor who can bring back the tourists, help our economy and ensure a better life for all of us.

We cannot let the city go into further decline with any of these Democratic candidates. Please, wake up and vote for someone who will lift all of us up.

Susan Green

Manhattan

The fact that Andrew Yang is slipping in the polls is the only good news in the mayoral race.

Eric Adams is talking about crime, while Yang thinks the biggest issues for the city are AI and climate change.

If Yang wins, people will be dreaming of “the good old days” under Mayor de Blasio, formerly thought to be the bottom of the barrel.

Andrew Delaney

Miami, Fla.

I am not impressed by any of the Democratic candidates for mayor of New York City.

What each of them is proposing will cause further crime, divisiveness and decay, raise taxes, make life more miserable for residents and visitors and drive more families out of the city.

What does it take to get through to the New York voter? How bad does it have to get before they abandon a party that is becoming more idiotic with every election cycle?

Take a look at cities and states that have been doing well under Republican leadership and consider voting Republican.

D.M. Diana

Greeley, Pa.

Even Adams is falling for it. He said the “solution” to city violent crime is to reach out to youth and improve mental-health services.

These chic answers are a guarantee that innocent New Yorkers will continue to be murdered, raped, thrown onto subway tracks and maimed.

Get the violent off the streets first. Whether they are criminal or mentally ill, sort that out afterward. Get them away from the rest of us first.

Paul O’Keefe

Union City, NJ

I generally agree with The Post’s endorsements, but I am baffled by its support of Adams for mayor.

His stance on the NYPD changes at his convenience. One day he’s anti-cop and a fierce critic of the NYPD (even though he was employed by the NYPD), and then he switches and comes across as pro-police.

Can New Yorkers elect a mayor who lacks common sense and leadership skills? His suggestion last summer to New Yorkers to settle disputes about illegal fireworks on their own and not call the police was deadly. Shatavia Walls, 33, died as a result.

Adams lacks the moral compass and common sense required to be a winning mayor. The people of New York deserve better.

Susan Berger

Brooklyn

Want to weigh in on today’s stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to [email protected]. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy and style.

Continue Reading

Trending