Connect with us

Opinion

Letters to the Editor — April 27, 2021

Published

on

Letters to the Editor — April 27, 2021

The Issue: This year’s Academy Awards, which saw Anthony Hopkins beat Chadwick Boseman for Best Actor.

I completely agree with Johnny Oleksinski’s critique of this year’s Oscars (“Worst Oscars ever could do them in,” April 26).

Just three minutes into the show, presenter Regina King decided to make it a race-baiting event rather than an entertaining event with her opinion on the Derek Chauvin case. Why don’t these entertainers know they get paid the big bucks to entertain us? I don’t care about their opinions.

Just because you have the platform doesn’t mean you should use it as a self-serving delivery service.

Linda Calabrese

Brooklyn

I am absolutely enraged at the reaction of many people to the supposed “snub” of the late, great Chadwick Boseman in favor of Anthony Hopkins (“Gone for Gold,” Johnny Oleksinski,” April 26).

Of course, it’s very sad that Boseman, a superb actor, is gone way too soon. But to give him an Oscar just because he passed away, when the Academy voters clearly felt Hopkins deserved the award more, would have been a travesty, an insult to Boseman’s legacy and totally unjust to Hopkins.

The Academy Awards are supposed to be awarded based on performance quality, not emotions.

Norman Gold

West Hempstead

I applaud the Oscars show for its diversity. It’s admirable and about time. But some believe Hopkins deserved to win. Just because Boseman is black and talented, and unfortunately passed away, doesn’t automatically guarantee an Oscar.

I thought it was admirable Hopkins mentioned Boseman, which shows what a class act he is.

Erica Sloane

New Rochelle

Kudos to Hopkins, who became the oldest actor to win the Best Actor Oscar for his role in “The Father.”

Vin Morabito

Scranton, Pa.

The Issue: The rise in violent crime, homelessness and chaos on the city’s streets over the past year.

When is Mayor de Blasio going to do the right thing by the citizens of New York City (“Open Your Eyes, Blas: Subways Are Unsafe,” PostOpinion, Nicole Gelinas, April 26)?

At least 15 people were shot in one weekend and transit workers and commuters are begging for a greater police presence — yet you defund the Police Department to satisfy the lefties.

Apparently, those who make the most noise get served rather than the silent majority who support this city and will be responsible for bringing it back to life.

Paul Baden

Matawan, NJ

My son and I came in on the train to visit and walk around, go to Penn Station and Grand Central and have lunch.

What a shock to see all the panhandlers and people clearly strung out on drugs and to smell urine in entryways around the Theater District. I haven’t seen it this bad in years. I did see police officers in front of stores monitoring.

We had the best service from the places we visited. The city still has its vibrancy, but I’m not coming back anytime soon until the mayor steps up and understands seriously what is going on in his wonderful city.

KC Malinowski

Farmington, Conn.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Still hopeless on NYC’s homeless

Published

on

Still hopeless on NYC’s homeless

New York City Transit President Sarah Feinberg minced no words Sunday in slamming the homeless advocates who “have sort of decided that the subway is a reasonable place for folks to live.”

“The answer should never be that someone lives on a bench or someone lives in a tunnel,” she told WABC radio. Darn right. And: “It boggles the mind that there are groups out there that have decided that this is an acceptable solution for these folks.” 

Worse, these groups “have devoted their time and their resources and their advocacy skills” to enabling such abuse of public spaces.

Yet Mayor Bill de Blasio, for his homelessness czar, tapped one of these advocates: Steven Banks, who has presided over a vast increase in city spending on the homeless and a simultaneous rise in the street-homeless problem.

Indeed, the advocates have city politicians so afraid to adopt a “tough love” approach to the homeless that Gov. Andrew Cuomo had to order late-night subway closures in the name of “cleaning,” just to stop these tortured souls from utterly taking over the system. But the closures are about to end — what then?

One good idea is to have places to bring the homeless besides a hospital or jail. But de Blasio put that initiative under the ThriveNYC umbrella — so it’s failed.

As The City reports, City Hall spent over $100 million to build two “diversion centers” for the mentally ill. But one hasn’t opened, and the other is barely used.

That’s right: Four years after $52 million went to rehab a 14,000-square-foot former IRS office in a graffiti-covered Bronx building into one center, it sits empty. Another $51 million actually opened the operation in East Harlem … this past November. It’s served a scant 45 clients since.

In short, conventional progressive thinking fails miserably at soft as well as tough love. Pray that the next mayor breaks from this foolishness.

Continue Reading

Opinion

The wrong time to enforce the new plastic-bag law

Published

on

The wrong time to enforce the new plastic-bag law

Sometimes, officials are too eager to move after a media exposé. Case in point, the reaction of the state Department of Environmental Conservation to reporting by The City that no grocery or bodega had been fined for ignoring the new ban on single-use plastic shopping bags.

Boom: Within hours, DEC announced it had issued 12 violation notices, to nine small businesses and three larger entities, including grocery chain Gristedes.

Hello: There’s a pandemic on, adding to the dangers of (already unsanitary) reusable bags and leaving residents, especially in lower-income areas, even more dependent on the closest-available food store.

The DEC, in short, had every reason to just issue written warnings (64 as of April 14) and hold off on fines. But now it has vowed to get tough, including $250 to $500 fines for ignoring warnings.

If Gov. Andrew Cuomo wants some good press, he should loudly order the DEC to return to its policy of mercy. Tell the environmental activists to hold their whining until the pandemic is over.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Eric Adams is the right choice for NYC

Published

on

Eric Adams is the right choice for NYC

The Post’s endorsement of Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams for mayor on Monday has sparked considerable attention, with key figures joining in backing him. Below is a roundup of what they’re saying.

Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr.: “Eric Adams will be a great mayor for the city of New York. I’m glad The Post agrees about having someone with Eric’s career and life experience informing him about how to fight for all New Yorkers.”

Diaz has been an increasingly important force in Democratic circles in the city whose endorsement will carry much weight.

Brooklyn Councilman Justin Brannan: “New York City is the nation’s economic engine and the fuel for that engine lives in the so-called ‘outer boroughs.’ Indeed, nearly 75 percent of all New York City essential workers live in Brooklyn, Queens, The Bronx and Staten Island. Eric Adams knows this, and that’s why he will be a mayor keyed in to the communities, like the one I represent, that are at the edge of the city geographically but at the core of what makes our city run.”

Brannan represents moderate and diverse working-class communities in Brooklyn that could help propel Adams to victory.

Henry Garrido, executive director, DC 37: “There is no candidate more aligned with what our members believe in and stand for. The soul of our city is at stake. We need a mayor who understands the plight of the essential workers who kept this city running and the struggles working people face. That’s Eric.”

There’s no way to overstate the importance of support from unions like Garrido’s. Not only will many of his members take a cue from him, but so will voters who back unions and watch their endorsements carefully.

Uniformed Fire Officers Association President Jake Lemonda: “Like The Post, the Uniformed Fire Officers Association believes Eric Adams is the right choice to lead the city out of these trying times because he offers the best chance of solving the issues bedeviling the entire city.”

Lemonda’s statement can help drum up support for Adams among the uniformed rank and file in the city. Adams’ service as a police officer will likewise help.

Sheikh Musa Drammeh, head of the National Community Peace Building Commission: “Eric Adams is uniquely qualified and positioned to move the city out of its multi-prong socioeconomic challenges. Despite being knocked down by the pandemic, Adams will bring it back to a new and higher level. He personally understands what poor New Yorkers are going through while also appreciating the contributions of wealthy New Yorkers to our economy. New York knows that Eric Adams is the right leader we need now.”

Sheikh Drammeh has led various efforts forging ties between Jews and Muslims as well as improving police-community relations.

David Gold, a consultant and former Wall Street banker: “Eric believes in New York and its future. Wall Street likes him because he is a man with a plan who sticks to it and cares about our city. We need to feel safe on the street, in the subway, in all of our boroughs, and importantly, people should be comfortable coming to New York. We need Eric Adams because New York is at a critical point — our next mayor will be instrumental in making sure we thrive. That should be Eric Adams.”

Gold knows Adams through his work supporting first-responders as well as widows and children of those who have died in the line of duty. His support may signal to Wall Streeters that Adams is no left-wing radical who’ll let the city fall to ruin and force the financial industry to flee.

Jenny Sedlis, who has headed the pro-charter-school advocacy group StudentsFirstNY: “We’re at a moment in public education where we can’t afford to take good ideas off the table. Eric Adams is not beholden to ways of doing things just because it’s how they’ve been done before; he’s committed to putting the needs of students front and center. New York City needs a mayor like Eric Adams who will fight for every student to have access to excellence and opportunity, no matter their zip code.”

Sedlis is fundraising for Strong Leadership NYC, a pro-Adams independent expenditure committee. Her decision to back him will strike a note with parents throughout the city who care about getting a good education for their kids but can’t afford private school.

Continue Reading

Trending