Ex-Atlanta police officer Garrett Rolfe has been charged with felony homicide and aggravated assault within the killing of Rayshard Brooks.


When Fulton County District Lawyer Paul Howard Jr. stated Atlanta police officer Devin Brosnan can be a witness towards Garrett Rolfe – the previous officer charged with felony murder in the shooting death of Rayshard Brooks – he added he was “shocked.”

Authorized consultants who spoke with USA TODAY on Wednesday have been shocked, too. It’s uncommon sufficient for an officer to be charged, one stated. It’s rarer nonetheless for an officer to interrupt via “the blue wall of silence” and testify, one other stated.

The revelation didn’t stick, nevertheless, as Brosnan’s attorneys shortly refuted Howard’s declare. Brosnan, who’s dealing with three lesser expenses, would cooperate with investigators, however “there isn’t any settlement between Mr. Brosnan and the DA’s workplace for Mr. Brosnan to be a ‘state’s witness,’” legal professional Amanda R. Clark Palmer informed USA TODAY in an electronic mail. 

Rayshard Brooks died after he was shot by a police officer: What happens now?

USA TODAY has reached out a number of instances to the Fulton County District Lawyer’s workplace for touch upon the standing of this case however has not heard again.

Getting an officer to testify towards one other is a frightening process: Howard’s workplace has prosecuted “about 40 of those circumstances,” he stated Wednesday, and he couldn’t keep in mind a time when an officer agreed to cooperate with the state. 

There are myriad the reason why. 

An inclination to ‘circle the wagons’

Law enforcement officials have lengthy operated with impunity, in accordance Dan Simon, a professor of legislation and psychology at Gould College of Regulation on the College of Southern California. Widespread video digicam use has introduced extra eyes and transparency to their work and the world is realizing “how a lot misconduct was hiding beneath the opacity,” he stated. 

“It’s a elementary tenet of group habits that there are robust norms of cohesion inside the group,” Simon stated. “That is notably so inside a gaggle that sees itself to be threatened or besieged by any kind of environmental state of affairs. Cops really feel like that. They very a lot belief their companions. They very a lot depend on their companions. Collectively, they understand themselves doing a process they usually really feel is underappreciated, overburdened.”

Rayshard Brooks was kicked, denied care: The stunning allegations against ex-Atlanta police officer Garrett Rolfe

That cohesion contributes to officers’ unwillingness to testify towards one another, he stated. Law enforcement officials — who work in worrying and life-threatening conditions — additionally really feel “righteous” about their work, which results in its personal issues, Simon added. 

“There’s this phenomenon referred to as ‘noble trigger corruption,'” Simon stated. “If you really feel you’re noble, you additionally really feel that it’s permitted to chop corners, twists and bend information, all for the noble trigger.

“That’s how they understand it. As soon as cops are acculturated into these methods of considering, it’s very arduous to vary these deep cultural beliefs, particularly since they presently really feel that they’re being put beneath the magnifying glass and likewise run via the ringer of social protests. Their pure tendency is to circle the wagons.”

A shift in police tradition? 

David Sklansky, a professor of legislation at Stanford College and school co-director on the Stanford Legal Justice Heart, stated one officer testifying towards one other was “nearly unprecedented.” 

Over the previous few many years, issues have turn into marginally higher, in line with Sklansky. There are extra officers in 2020 than there have been 50 years in the past who see the failings within the system and who’re “horrified” by abuses of energy, he stated. 

“Police departments have been altering and the encircling tradition have been altering,” Sklanksy stated.

What occurs now? Rayshard Brooks died after he was shot by Atlanta police officer Garrett Rolfe

He added officers testifying towards one another is “continues to be rarer than it needs to be.”

“The blue wall of silence nonetheless can lead officers to be reluctant to testify towards their fellow officers, however increasingly officers, I feel, perceive that the wrongful use of drive, notably lethal drive, is a big drawback,” he stated. 

Reform will not be “fairly or straightforward,” Simon stated, however it’s essential. For weeks, protesters throughout the nation have taken to the streets, calling for change within the aftermath of the deaths of Breonna Taylor, George Floyd and Brooks, all by the hands of police.

“That is actually unfolding in entrance of our eyes and I feel it’s going to trigger a paradigm shift,” Simon stated. “It has to. Progress is not going to return straightforward as a result of these officers, a lot of whom joined the drive with the very best of intentions, and plenty of of whom proceed to carry out their jobs with the very best of intentions, they’re socialized right into a system that implicitly condones dishonesty.”

Overcoming a big impediment 

It is uncommon sufficient for a police officer to be charged with against the law for actions within the line of responsibility, stated Mary Fan, a professor on the College of Washington College of Regulation. 

Getting an officer to testify towards a colleague is “two ranges of uncommon,” she stated. 

“I feel what we’re seeing enjoying out in our nation are more and more viralized requires prosecution and intense strain on police leaders and prosecutors to deliver expenses in these circumstances,” Fan stated. “We’re in a historic second of an actual disaster in belief and deference to the police.”

‘Lawful however terrible’: Atlanta police had better options than lethal force in Rayshard Brooks shooting, experts say

Talking on the whole phrases, Sklansky stated a big impediment prosecutors usually face in circumstances towards officers is the “reluctance of fellow officers to testify towards one another.” 

Getting officers to testify towards one another when expenses are filed is only one piece of the puzzle, in line with Simon. He referred to as for a systemic overhaul. 

“The issue is, really, how can we remodel the prison justice system into a way more clear, trustworthy and self-reflective social system?” he requested. 


Present Thumbnails

Present Captions

Learn or Share this story: