Connect with us


Dana White gives a rare look at UFC’s discretionary bonuses



Dana White gives a rare look at UFC’s discretionary bonuses

Regular UFC fans are well aware of the post-fight bonus system. Some more dedicated followers of the top MMA promotion might also have heard about discretionary bonuses that fighters have been given over the years.

But while the Fight of the Night and Performance of the Night recipients, announced at the completion of each event for standout efforts, take home an announced $50,000 each, little is known about the discretionary bonuses.

In speaking with The Post on Wednesday, Dana White opened up about a subject he typically does not discuss: money, in particular the sums that go out to his stable of fighters. That included shedding some light on the discretionary bonuses.

For most of the 41 events held in 2020, four $50,000 “of the Night” bonuses were handed out. Five were awarded on two occasions, and six were given at a particularly action-packed UFC on ESPN event in July headlined by middleweights Robert Whittaker and Darren Till. That adds up to a total of $8.4 million in announced bonus money.

But the UFC also told The Post that the total bonus payout for the pandemic-affected calendar year reached $18 million, including the previously-announced bonuses. That leaves $9.6 million left over.

White said that the general practice is that for “everybody who delivered on the card, I write a check” that ranges from $4,000 to $25,000 each, “depending on what I thought of their fight.”

“I’ll give you an example,” White said. “There will be a night where some crazy s–t happens throughout the whole card, and then we have to pick what we thought [were] the $50,000 [bonus recipients], but somebody else was right in the running. They could have got it too. And it depends, I’ll write them anywhere from $10,000 to $25,000.”

With 456 fights contested last year in the octagon — and two fighters per bout, of course — the average discretionary bonus comes out to about $10,526 per fighter, per fight. 

The announced bonus awards have been set at $50,000 since the start of 2013, when White said the UFC wanted to standardize the figure that had generally varied anywhere from $40,000 to $75,000 in 2011 and 2012; on three occasions in 2011, the amount reached or surpassed $100,000. 

White told MMA Junkie in 2013 the reason for standardizing the value of the bonuses, which he described as “a gift,” was in the spirit of fairness to fighters who weren’t scheduled on a night when a larger bonus sum was given out.

“It was fair to keep them straight all the way across so no matter what card you fight on, it’s the same bonus,” White said at the time, adding that “nobody ever complained about” the imbalance in the amounts from fight card to fight card.

Unlike Performance of the Night and Fight of the Night, the individual discretionary bonus allocation is not made public. Fighters themselves rarely bring up the practice, although on rare occasions they offer a snapshot into how these bonuses come about. After accidentally soiling herself during a 2017 loss to Felice Herrig, Justine Kish spoke of how White reached out the next day to check in, likely realizing what she referred to as “a little bit of humiliation behind what happened” and intimating there was an added bonus coming her way.

“The other thing that’s nice is that Dana hinted that I have a discretionary bonus, meaning a gift, for my performance,” Kish told The Domenick Nati Show in the days after the fight. “So UFC’s very good at giving little secret bonuses — at least to me — here and there. … I didn’t ask, and I didn’t pry how much it’s going to be or anything, so we’ll see.”

White reinforced to The Post that he generally doesn’t feel inclined to publicize the amounts paid out to fighters, saying he’s resisted overtures from UFC employees to be more forthcoming in discussing money.

“Obviously, there’s a lot of money involved and, believe me, many people, including people who work for me, said, ‘If you would just say publicly what you do,’ and I say, ‘but I don’t care.’ ” White said. “It’s nobody’s business what these guys make.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


College football’s top 25 quarterbacks for 2021: Spencer Rattler, Sam Howell lead the way



College football's top 25 quarterbacks for 2021: Spencer Rattler, Sam Howell lead the way

Who will fill the void left by Trevor Lawrence in 2021?

Lawrence, who was the No. 1 pick in the 2021 NFL Draft, was No. 1 on Sporting News’ list of top 25 quarterbacks each of the last two seasons. He was part of a class that sent five quarterbacks to the first round of last year’s draft, a class that included Ohio State’s Justin Fields and Alabama’s Mac Jones. 

MORE: SN’s Preseason Top 25

The three dominant powers in college football have new quarterbacks this season, and all three made our top 25. The No. 1 choice, however, is an open debate between Oklahoma’s Spencer Rattler and North Carolina’s Sam Howell. That will spill over into the 2022 NFL Draft, too. 

With that in mind, Sporting News looks at the top 25 college football quarterbacks for 2021:


  • Thompson-Robinson enters his third season as a starter paired with Chip Kelly in what is a show-me year for the Bruins. DTR showed signs of progress last year with increases in completion percentage, yards per attempt and rushing yards, and he has the potential to be Kelly’s next prolific college quarterback. Can he put it all together for UCLA in 2021?

  • Nix plateaued last season from a statistical perspective, and he’s 15-9 as a starter heading into his junior season. He averages 14 TD passes and seven rushing TDs per season, and it will be interesting to see what first-year coach Bryan Harsin brings to Nix’s game. Opinions vary on the third-year starter, but the play-making ability is there.

  • Doege ranked 16th in the FBS with 2,587 yards, and the Bowling Green transfer returns for one more year in Troy Brown’s offense with the Mountaineers. Doege has maintained a consistent completion percentage at both stops, and he has one last chance to lead a run in the Big 12.

  • Morgan struggled last season, but that was part of a season that was broken up by COVID-19 interruptions. The potential for a bounce-back to the 2019 form, in which Morgan threw for 3,253 yards and 30 TDs is possible. Morgan must prove himselfwithout Tyler Johnson and Rashod Bateman, who have both moved on to the NFL since ’19.

  • It’s finally Jones’ turn at Florida after a three-year wait, and he showed glimpses of success in a niche role with Dan Mullen. Jones completed 64 percent of his passes and averaged 5.6 yards per carry in that limited role, and he has the potential to be the SEC’s breakout performer for 2021.

  • Sanders was injured in last season’s opener at Tulsa, and he had an up-and-down sophomore season with the Cowboys. Sanders re-emerged as a threat in the running game in the final four games, and his Cheez-It Bowl performance — which included 350 total yards of offense and four TDs — is a reminder of what he can produce in Oklahoma State’s offense.

  • Cunningham is an experienced three-year starter that returns for Scott Satterfield’s third season with the Cardinals. Cunningham’s accuracy improved in 2020, but he threw more interceptions in the process. Cunningham played well in losses to Virginia Tech and Miami, and he had two 100-yard rushing games.

  • This is a presumptive placement knowing Stroud still hasn’t won the starting job in a three-way battle with Kyle McCord and Jack Miller III. That said, Stroud had the lead in the spring and whoever starts for the Buckeyes will have the nation’s deepest group of wide receivers to work with. Stroud can work with that in Ryan Day’s offense, and that could vault him into the top five on this list by the end of the season.

  • Jurkovec, a Notre Dame transfer, turned out to be an excellent fit with Jeff Hafley at Boston College. He had four 300-yard games and led the Eagles to a 6-4 record. Jurkovec needs to be more of a threat in the running game to take the next step, and he struggled with accuracy in big games against Clemson and Notre Dame last season.

  • Willis has the most rushing yards of any QB on this list after piling up 944 yards and 14 TDs in 2020. He also passed for 2,250 yards, 20 TDs and six interceptions. That two-way production is getting the attention of NFL scouts, and he will continue to evolve with another year in Huge Freeze’s offense at Liberty against a fairly tame slate in 2021.

  • Get to know Strong now, because he has a chance to be that first-round pick in the 2022 NFL Draft you’ll be learning about later. He completed 70.1 percent of his passes with 27 TDs and four interceptions last season. The Wolf Pack was 5-0 when he passed for 300 yards or more in 2020. Strong has high-end potential and should continue to deliver in the Mountain West Conference.

  • Daniels played in four games last season, which made it difficult to see how much he improved as a sophomore. He’s an efficient passer who has 22 TDs and three interceptions with the Sun Devils, and he averaged 6.8 yards per carry on the ground. The dual-threat talent is there, and he’s capable of leading Arizona State to the Pac-12 championship game.

  • Penix’s thrilling dash to the goal line against Penn State was the signature play in a break-through season for the Hoosiers. He finished with 1,645 passing yards, 14 TDs and four interceptions before suffering a torn ACL. Penix is the top returning quarterback in the Big Ten, and he will need to improve his completion percentage in 2021.

  • McCall put Coastal Carolina on the college football map with a breakout redshirt freshman season. He finished with 2,488 passing yards, 26 TDs and three interceptions. He also added 569 rushing yards and seven TDs. McCall had five games with at least four total TDs, and the Chanticleers were 4-1 in those games. What will he do for a sophomore encore?

  • Young has a tough act to follow after Mac Jones led Alabama to a national championship in 2020. Young played mostly in mop-up duty last season, and he averaged 7.1 yards per passing attempt with a 59.1 completion percentage. Improvements will need to be made, but new offensive coordinator Bill O’Brien and the same-old loaded supporting cast should lead to big numbers for Young.

  • Purdy was ranked No. 8 on this list in 2020. He opted to stay at Iowa State for his senior season, and the expectations in Ames are higher than ever. Purdy’s numbers have been consistent, and the Cyclones are 6-3 the last two seasons when he passes for 300 yards or more. Purdy emerged as a more effective runner last season, and the chance to lead a Big 12 championship run is on the table.

  • Georgia’s offense meshed once Daniels took over the starting job in 2020. He averaged 10.3 yards per attempt, and his 178.5 quarterback rating would have ranked in the top 10 with more attempts. Daniels shook off the interceptions that hampered him at USC as a freshman, and he should be more comfortable with a full offseason at Georgia.

  • King emerged as the answer at quarterback for Miami last season. He meshed well with new offensive coordinator Rhett Lashlee, especially early in the season. King finished with 2,686 passing yards, 538 rushing yards and 27 total TDs. That success was tempered by an untimely ACL injury in the Cheez-It Bowl loss to Oklahoma State. King is expected to make a full recovery before the opener against Alabama.

  • Ridder returns to lead to Cincinnati, which is the premier College Football Playoff buster heading into 2021. Ridder is 30-5 as a starter, and he has passed for 57 TDs and 20 interceptions. He also averages 6.0 yards per carry. That dual-threat production elevated the program, and Ridder will get to showcase those skills in a pair of challenging non-conference games at Indiana and Notre Dame.

  • Slovis should follow in the footsteps of Sam Darnold, Mark Sanchez and Matt Leinart as USC’s next first-round quarterback. The 6-2, 200-pounder is a third-year starter, and he’s completed 70 percent of his passes with 47 TDs and 16 interceptions. Slovis is 1-3 against Top 25 teams as a starter, and he is tasked with leading the Trojans back to the Pac-12 championship game.

  • Gabriel is one of the most efficient quarterbacks in the FBS. He’s averaged 3,611 passing yards and 31 TDs the past two seasons, and that comes with just 11 total interceptions. He needs to improve his completion percentage and become a little more active in the running game, but that will happen with the arrival of first-year coach Gus Malzahn.

  • Who would have guessed Lane Kiffin has the top returning quarterback in the SEC? Corral led all quarterbacks on this list with 3,843 yards of total offense last season. He finished with 29 TDs and 13 interceptions, and he rushed for 506 yards. The Rebels averaged 39.2 points per game and should be even more entertaining in Kiffin’s second season. Corral’s play-making skills make him an intriguing Heisman sleeper.

  • Uiagalelei followsTrevor Lawrence at Clemson, and fans got a peek at the five-star talent in two high-profile starts against Boston College and Notre Dame. Uiagalelei showed up with 914 passing yards, 5 TDs and no interceptions as a freshman, and the 6-4, 250-pound quarterback is a red-zone running option who scored four TDs. That experience should lead to another big year for the Tigers, and Uiagalelei is Clemson’s next first-round star at the position.

  • Howell averages 10.3 yards per passing attempt the last two seasons, and he piled up 7,224 yards, 68 TDs and 14 interceptions in that stretch. He’s been the centerpiece of a quick rebuild under Mack Brown in Chapel Hill, and the third-year starter should be even better as a junior. Five ACC quarterbacks have been taken in the first round of the NFL Draft the last five seasons, a list that includes Deshaun Watson (2017), Mitchell Trubisky (2017), Lamar Jackson (2018), Daniel Jones (2019) and Trevor Lawrence (2021). Howell is next in line.

  • Rattler is the Heisman Trophy favorite, and that’s a sound bet given Lincoln Riley has worked with two winners in Baker Mayfield and Kyler Murray. He struggled with early-season turnovers, but in Oklahoma’s last eight games — all wins — he averaged 255.8 passing yards with 18 TDs and two interceptions. Rattler does not run much, but he still scored six rushing TDs in 2020. Another year with Riley should produce even more, especially with the loaded supporting cast at the skill positions at Oklahoma.

Continue Reading


Why Brooks Koepka, Bryson DeChambeau aren’t paired together at the U.S. Open



Why Brooks Koepka, Bryson DeChambeau aren't grouped together at the U.S. Open

The USGA decided not to grant the golf world its wish. During the 2021 U.S. Open, rivals Brooks Koepka and Bryson DeChambeau will not be playing together — at least not for the first two rounds.

Instead, DeChambeau will be paired with Hideki Matsuyama and Tyler Strafaci while Koepka will be playing with Collin Morikawa and Justin Thomas. And apparently, there is a reason for that.

According to Brad Faxon, the USGA did consider pairing DeChambeau and Koepka but their efforts to do so were rebuffed by DeChambeau.

“I found out last night that the USGA did call Bryson DeChambeau and his agent to ask them if they’d be OK with that, and Bryson declined,” Faxon said.

MORE: Full pairings, tee times for the first two rounds of the U.S. Open

This about lines up with what Rick Reilly said in a deleted tweet. Reilly claimed that the USGA wanted the past three winners of the event — Koepka, DeChambeau and Gary Woodland — to play together. But Woodland said that DeChambeau would “never do it.”


It’s unclear exactly why DeChambeau would be reportedly refusing to play with Koepka. Obviously, the two have been embroiled in a long-running feud that dates back to 2019, but Koepka has conveyed that he would be fine playing with DeChambeau.

During a media session on Tuesday, DeChambeau denied that he had been approached by the USGA about the pairing, saying that he would “have been OK with it,” but that “there was never really anything that went through me.” Koepka also said on Tuesday during his interviews that he had not been asked by the USGA about the trio with DeChambeau and Woodland, either. 

Still, this feels like a missed opportunity for the USGA, even if it’s through no fault of its own. The Koepka-DeChambeau rivalry has intensified in recent weeks and has drawn the interest of sports fans everywhere. An on-camera moment showed Koepka getting frustrated with DeChambeau yelling during an interview and rekindled the feud, while supporters of Koepka were thrown out of the Memorial Tournament for heckling DeChambeau.

MORE: Full betting guide to the 2021 U.S. Open

Certainly, this feud has been “good for the game,” as Koepka has intimated, and had the two stars played alongside one another, it would’ve been some rare must-watch early-round golf.

Instead, golf fans will have to settle for DeChambeau playing with 2021 Masters champion Matsuyama while Koepka plays with the 2017 PGA Champion Thomas and 2020 PGA Championship winner Morikawa.

But deep down, they’ll be hoping that DeChambeau and Koepka make the cut and get paired on one of the weekend days.

Continue Reading


Charles Barkley rips Bucks after ’embarrassing’ Game 5 loss vs. Nets: ‘That was awful basketball’



Charles Barkley rips Bucks after 'embarrassing' Game 5 loss vs. Nets: 'That was awful basketball'

You could feel it coming once the final buzzer sounded to signal the end of Tuesday’s Game 5 between the Bucks and Nets. You knew there would be a strong Charles Barkley rant on the “NBA on TNT” postgame show after Milwaukee collapsed down the stretch and watched Brooklyn take a 3-2 series lead with a 114-108 win at the Barclays Center.

Well, Chuck delivered. The Hall of Famer didn’t hold back on a Bucks team that led by 16 points at halftime, only to be outscored 71-49 over the final two periods. Barkley was critical of Milwaukee’s inability to make adjustments and create easy buckets on the offensive end. 

MORE: NBA players react to Durant’s historic playoff performance

“That was embarrassing for basketball,” Barkley said. “To lose that game, to have that — like, you could tell they were gonna lose the game at halftime. . . . When you do dumb stuff and it works, you keep doing dumb stuff. You sit there — when they were doing dumb stuff in Game 1 and Game 2, you’re like, ‘Well, that’s how they play, Chuck.’ Like, so? They’re killing them in the paint, but they’re gonna keep jacking up threes just because that’s how they play.”

Barkley and the other members of the “NBA on TNT” crew gave credit to Kevin Durant, who led Brooklyn to victory with 49 points, 17 rebounds, 10 assists, three steals and two blocks in 48 minutes. The Nets’ role players also stepped up, most notably Jeff Green (27 points on 8-of-11 shooting) and Blake Griffin (17 points on 7-of-11 shooting).

But “The Round Mound of Rebound” just couldn’t fathom how the Bucks had blown such a golden opportunity, especially considering the Nets leaned on an injured James Harden for 46 minutes and didn’t have Kyrie Irving at all.

“Like Herm Edwards said, ‘You play to win the game.’ And that was one of the dumbest games,” Barkley said. “Man, I am so mad right now because they got a bunch of really good guys, and they play dumb. And they deserved to lose that game. Shout out to Kevin Durant and Jeff Green, but man, the other team had something to do with it. That was awful basketball.”

The Bucks will head back to Milwaukee for Game 6 on Thursday looking to avoid elimination. One key to that contest: Doing less “dumb stuff.”

Continue Reading