Connect with us


COVID-19: Office Christmas party ‘dead for now’ with staff opting for ‘cash instead’, survey finds | UK News



Back view of business woman making video call and showing thumb up to laptop on the online briefing while sit on sofa at home. (Back view of business woman making video call and showing thumb up to laptop on the online briefing while sit on sofa at ho

Office Christmas parties are “dead for now”, with most employees preferring cash instead of some form of virtual get-together, according to a new survey.

Three out of five firms will not be arranging work bashes this year, according to research by jobs site Glassdoor.

And two thirds of the 2,000 workers surveyed said they did not want an office party anyway because of the coronavirus crisis.

Around half of those polled said Christmas parties were a waste of time and money, giving an excuse for people to get drunk.

Many also said they would not attend a ‘virtual’ work party

And a similar number said they would not attend a “virtual” work party.

Joe Wiggins of Glassdoor said: “The classic work Christmas party is dead, for now, and who knows if it will rise again in 2021.

“Many employees clearly feel that some sort of virtual Christmas party is pointless and they would rather just have the cash instead.

“Of course, it’s up to each employer to decide what is right for them and what fits best with their culture and values.

“There is significant support though for a work party of some sort in 2021, regardless of the occasion, when the pandemic is losing momentum and people can safely socialise again.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Kier closes in on £110m sale of housebuilding division | Business News



Guy Hands

The construction group Kier is closing in on the sale of its loss-making housebuilding division as it seeks to shore up its balance sheet.

Sky News has learnt that London-listed Kier is within days of entering into exclusive talks about the disposal, with the private equity tycoon Guy Hands among the remaining bidders for the business.

City sources said that a decision could be made by the company’s board as soon as this week.

Guy Hands

Mr Hands’ Terra Firma Capital Partners has been circling Kier Living for months, having previously contemplated an acquisition of the business more than a year ago.

The identity of other bidders for the division is unclear, although a source close to Kier said on Monday night: “He [Hands] is not the only game in town.”

Analysts have pencilled in a valuation of approximately £100m for Kier Living – a sum almost equivalent to the debt-laden company’s entire market capitalisation of £122m.

In September, Kier said it was examining another equity-raise alongside the auction of its housebuilding business.

“Kier Living is a strong business but has limited operational synergies with other parts of the group,” it said at the time.

“There is a new management team in place who have reorganised the business into a smaller more cash-focused operation.”

It emerged last week that Kier Living had made a loss of almost £90m in the year to 30 June 2020.

Last year, Kier replaced its chief executive with Andrew Davies, an experienced industry figure who had been due to take up the top job at Carillion shortly after it collapsed in January 2018.

Kier is a significant government contractor, with substantial infrastructure projects on its books including Crossrail, the HS2 rail link and the new nuclear power station at Hinkley Point.

If Terra Firma does clinch the purchase of Kier Living, it would be among Mr Hands’ most significant corporate purchases for years.

Mr Hands is best-known for his ill-fated ownership of EMI, the music group, which ended up in a further set of legal disputes that he eventually walked away from.

Some of his investments have, though, proved to be extraordinarily lucrative.

Kier and Terra Firma declined to comment.

Rothschild, the investment bank, is advising Kier on the sale.

Continue Reading


Prompt Payment Code strengthened to help small firms | Business News




Big businesses have been told they must pay small suppliers within 30, rather than 60 days, under a strengthened Prompt Payment Code.

The Department for Business said the code, first introduced in 2008, needed to be bolstered to protect small firms as poor payment practices were “still rife” and threatened the viability of solid businesses as the country emerges from the COVID-19 pandemic.

It said that from July, the 3,000 companies currently signed up to the code would have to pay 95% of invoices to suppliers with 50 employees or fewer within 30 days.

The department also demanded that either the chief executive, finance chief or a director of a participating company made a personal commitment to the code.

Shell is among companies to have been suspended from the code

The idea behind it is that those signed up become trusted customers for small suppliers but they must, in return, ensure prompt payment of invoices.

Last year, Shell and BAE Systems were among the firms to be suspended from the code for failing to honour the pay commitment.

Many companies taking part go further.

The Federation of Small Businesses, which estimates around 50,000 small companies go under annually because of late payments, recently hailed a commitment by Tesco to offer instant payment terms to small suppliers through February 2022.

Small business minister Paul Scully said: “Our incredible small businesses will be vital to our recovery from the coronavirus pandemic, supporting millions of livelihoods across the UK.

“Today, we are relieving some of the pressure on small business owners by introducing significant reforms to the UK payments regime – pushing big businesses to pay their suppliers on time.

“By signing up to the Prompt Payment Code and sticking to its rules, large firms can help Britain to build back better, protecting the jobs, innovation and growth which small businesses drive right across the UK.”

Continue Reading


The economic challenges facing Joe Biden as he enters the White House | Business News



The economic challenges facing Joe Biden as he enters the White House | Business News

Joe Biden faces two economic challenges in taking office this week.

The first and most immediate priority will be to have to get to grips with the COVID-19 pandemic and the damage it has inflicted on the US economy.

The roll-out of vaccines itself is way behind where those who run US health policy had hoped it would be and, with the number of cases having topped 23 million, the pandemic is still raging. Mr Biden’s challenge here will be to try to control and bring down the spread of the virus without doing further harm to the economy.

Biden inauguration: Watch and follow events on Sky News from 1pm on Wednesday, with the ceremony starting at 4pm

Along with this comes the second economic challenge, chiefly, how to put right the damage that has already been done to the US economy.

The latest figures spell this out.

Some 140,000 Americans lost their jobs in December – the first month since April last year that more jobs were lost than created – and, of the 22.2 million jobs that were lost in March and April last year as the US went into lockdown, only half have to date been restored.

One knock-on from that has been that the US consumer, a reliable stalwart on whom the global economy has traditionally been able to rely, has gone into hibernation. December was the third month in a row that US retail sales fell while the November retail sales figures, which take in the post-Thanksgiving ‘Black Friday’ promotional events and the start of the Christmas shopping season, were also revised lower.

So Mr Biden has to find a way of stimulating growth and giving employers the confidence they need to start hiring people again.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Good thing’ Trump won’t be at inauguration

To that end, the president-elect last week unveiled a $1.9trn spending package, all of which would be funded by extra borrowing. The package includes a $20bn investment in a national vaccination programme and its central proposal involves sending cheques of $1,400 to individual Americans on top of the $600 payments that were agreed by US Congress last month.

Mr Biden also wants to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour and also proposes raising emergency jobless benefits to $400 per week.

Yet getting these measures through US Congress, even with the majority the Democrats now enjoy in Senate, will be difficult. Moderate Democrats share the concerns most Republicans have about government borrowing and not all of Mr Biden’s spending proposals can be passed with a simple Senate majority.

A lot of measures require 60 votes to get through Senate, which means that Mr Biden will have to get some Republicans on board, something that seems unlikely with contentious measures such as the $350bn in emergency funding the president-elect proposes giving state and local governments. Mr Biden is a past master at reaching across the Senate floor and cutting deals with the Republicans but getting some of these measures through will test even him.

As he seeks to revive growth, Mr Biden will receive support from the US Federal Reserve, America’s central bank. The Fed, with which Donald Trump frequently clashed, can be relied on to keep US monetary very accommodative to support growth.

A person walks past the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) at Wall Street on November 16, 2020 in New York City
US stock markets are at record levels

But this, too, will create challenges of its own. The Fed’s asset purchase scheme, quantitative easing in the jargon, has pushed up the price of financial assets and helped drive the US stock market to record levels. This has in turn helped drive up wealth inequality.

So the biggest short-term economic challenge is navigating the US economy through COVID-19 and repairing the damage done by the pandemic.

Longer term, there are other challenges, among the most pressing of which is to upgrade America’s infrastructure. Anyone who has visited the US in recent years will not have failed to note the woeful state of the country’s roads, bridges and airports. This in theory ought to be a huge opportunity for the government, not least because of the job creation potential it carries, but again will require vast spending increases that will need to be funded.

Equipping the existing the US workforce with the skills required to make the economy more competitive will also be a big challenge.

The US has a big skills shortage in fields such as healthcare and professional services where there are more vacancies than there are Americans able to fill them. Closely linked to this is immigration. Donald Trump sought to limit both legal and illegal immigration, in the face of opposition from many of the country’s business leaders, who would like to see changes in the rules enabling the US to modernise its immigration policy in line with the needs of the economy.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Removal team seen at the White House

Business leaders, who were among those most vocal in their response to the Black Lives Matter protests last year, will also be receptive to efforts made to reduce racial inequalities in the economy – something on which the US Chamber of Commerce, the country’s leading business organisation, has been increasingly vocal. That is not only a societal challenge, it is also an economic one, since racial inequalities undoubtedly result in wasted potential.

Then there are also technological challenges. Mr Biden is widely expected to bring the US back into the Paris agreement on climate change and, with that, will come the need to green the US economy. Facilitating more investment in green technology will represent a challenge but it is also a huge opportunity.

Related to that is making America more competitive. For all his divisiveness, Mr Trump had some major policy successes, the biggest of which were the tax reforms and cuts he made early in his presidency.

It was the biggest shake-up in the US tax system in 30 years and went a long way to increase America’s attractiveness as an investment destination. Mr Biden would be wise not to unwind much of that. The flip side is that Mr Trump also revelled in beginning trade wars and raising tariffs against countries, chiefly China, that he did not think were trading fairly with the US.

The latest trade surplus that China has reported shows how little impact these tariffs have had other than to raise prices for US businesses and consumers. Mr Biden will be tempted to move back in a more globalist direction but this will also prove challenging and not least because the US still needs to be taking a stand on the theft of its intellectual property rights by China.

Another entity against which Mr Biden may feel he needs to take a stand, as hinted during his election campaign, is big tech. Trying to rein in big tech’s powers is something in which the new president may enjoy bipartisan support but, even here, he will have to be careful for fear of damaging a sector in which the US is a global powerhouse.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump warns Biden: Be careful what you wish for

One challenge Mr Biden is likely to shirk, however, is US government borrowing.

As with other advanced economies, including the UK, government borrowing has ballooned during the pandemic. Under Mr Trump, the national debt shot up by nearly $7trn to $27trn, of which $22trn is publicly held.

America’s debt to GDP ratio now stands at its highest level since the early 1950s. It used to be the case that the Republicans were seen as the party of fiscal responsibility, cutting public spending and putting up taxes, while the Democrats were seen as profligate and free-spending.

That has not been the case for a very long time. During the last 50 years, the only US president to have successfully balanced the budget is Bill Clinton (although some credit the tax increases of George HW Bush for this), with George W Bush, Barack Obama and Mr Trump all presiding over big deficits. Mr Biden, to judge from his fiscal stimulus package, is likely to do the same.

That may not seem like a big deal when interest rates are close to zero.

But combine it with the fact that, thanks to QE, three-quarters of the dollars now in circulation have been created in the last 10 years and the overall effect has been to undermine the greenback’s status as the world’s reserve currency.

That status underpins America’s global hegemony and there are plenty of other countries, including Russia, China and Iran, who would be delighted were it to be lost.

It may not seem especially obvious – but preserving the dollar’s reserve status may yet create another challenge to the incoming president.

Continue Reading