Connect with us

Tech

Climate change: UK promises to cut emissions by more than two thirds by 2030 | Climate News

Published

on

Climate change: UK promises to cut emissions by more than two thirds by 2030 | Climate News

The government has promised to cut greenhouse gas emissions by more than two thirds (68%) of what they were in 1990 by 2030.

The announcement is what’s known as an NDC – or nationally determined contribution – and is a key factor in efforts to tackle climate change.

Under the Paris climate change agreement of 2015, all countries are obliged to update their commitments to cut emissions and deliver NDCs by the end of 2020.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Do the PM’s green plans stack up?

The UK is the first major economy to announce its NDC and is hoping its promise to effectively increase the emissions reduction from 53% to 68% will encourage other countries to follow suit.

The emissions are measured against the level they were in 1990.

But it’s an ambitious pledge, given current figures show the UK has only reduced its emissions by 45% since 1990.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson said: “We are taking the lead with an ambitious new target to reduce our emissions by 2030 faster than any major economy. But this is a global effort.”

More from Paris Agreement

The government is making the pledge a week before hosting a virtual climate ambition event marking a year to the landmark COP26 climate conference, which has been delayed until November 2021 because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The UK’s emissions promise is in line with what the Committee on Climate Change, which independently advises the government, says is necessary to meet the legally-binding target of the UK reaching net zero by 2050.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Govt to ban new diesel cars by 2030

Richard Black, director of the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, said: “Britain is out ahead of most of the other big nations, it’s committed more than the EU is likely to do, and it’s more than the US is likely to be able to do, and certainly more than the likes of Australia have done.

“It’s roughly on track for getting to the legally-binding net zero target and the hope clearly is that it will encourage other countries to come forward.

“There are a number of big countries that haven’t put forward this kind of commitment, for example India, and Russia is another.”

But Professor Saleemul Huq, director of the International Centre for Climate Change and Development, speaking to Sky News from Bangladesh, said current promises aren’t ambitious enough to save countries like his from catastrophic climate change.

He said: “We are at the end of receiving those climate impacts, so they [the UK government] may like to pat themselves on the back – and we have to acknowledge they’ve done a bit.

“It’s not that they aren’t doing anything, but they are simply not doing enough. And the enough is what matters.

“It’s whether they can affect the impacts of the climate on the most vulnerable countries and communities and they’re not going to be able to do that, so from our perspective it isn’t enough.

“It seems they don’t have any announcements on supporting vulnerable countries for adaptation and we would have expected that to be included and speaks to the lack of credibility to the COP26 presidency.

“I think the 68% reduction is a move in the right direction. However, from the perspective of the most vulnerable countries it isn’t enough because it won’t keep warming to 1.5 degrees.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

COP26 conference pushed back

Labour’s shadow business secretary Ed Miliband said the party welcomed the “important strengthening” of the 2030 target, but said it was the “minimum we should aim for”.

“Our goal should be to go further and faster, cutting the significant majority of emissions in this decisive decade, which is the right way to lead in creating the climate jobs of the future and keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees,” he said.

“As we move to this higher target, it is clear there is now a yawning gap between the government’s aspirations and its policies to deliver them.

“The government didn’t have the policies to meet their previous target and the chasm will be even greater now.”

International attention will now turn to countries like the US, China and other major economies to speed up their promises to reduce emissions in the run up to the COP.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

Google investigating ethical AI team member over accessing thousands of sensitive files | Science & Tech News

Published

on

Google investigating ethical AI team member over accessing thousands of sensitive files | Science & Tech News

Google is investigating a member of its ethical AI team after they were found to have taken thousands of sensitive files from its servers and shared the information with external accounts.

The investigation follows the forced exit of Timnit Gebru, a Black woman and prominent researcher on the team whose departure provoked controversy over Google‘s attitude to employees from ethnic minority backgrounds.

One of Ms Gebru’s colleagues, Margaret Mitchell, “had been using automated scripts to look through her messages to find examples showing discriminatory treatment of Gebru,” as Axios reported.

In a statement sent to Axios, Google confirmed the investigation.

“Our security systems automatically lock an employee’s corporate account when they detect that the account is at risk of compromise due to credential problems or when an automated rule involving the handling of sensitive data has been triggered,” it said.

“In this instance, yesterday our systems detected that an account had exfiltrated thousands of files and shared them with multiple external accounts. We explained this to the employee earlier today.”

The precise nature of Ms Gebru’s departure has been disputed.

The researcher and her colleagues claimed she had been fired, while Google executives said they accepted her offer to resign. Ms Gebru responded that she had not offered to resign, only threatened to.

Inspiring the controversy was a paper which Ms Gebru had co-authored on the risks of AI, including biases and the environmental impact of developing the technology.

She claimed that she had been asked by Google to withdraw the paper, with the company’s head of AI research, Jeff Dean, explaining that the company felt the paper ignored relevant research on mitigating many of the risks it described.

In a memo circulated internally at Google in December, the company’s chief executive Sundar Pichai said he was looking into how Ms Gebru was treated at the company, although no findings from that inquiry have yet been published

Continue Reading

Tech

Mystery of butterfly flight finally cracked by scientists | Science & Tech News

Published

on

Mystery of butterfly flight finally cracked by scientists | Science & Tech News

Scientists believe they have finally cracked the mystery of how butterflies fly despite their “unusually short, broad and large wings” compared to their body size.

A new study published in the Journal of the Royal Society finds that the key is not in the downstroke, when the butterflies’ wings push them forward, but in the upstroke when the wings clap together.

“When the wings clap together at the end of upstroke the air between the wings is pressed out, creating a jet, pushing the animal in the opposite direction,” the researchers say.

The theory about wing claps to explain butterfly flight was first proposed in the 1970s but has only just been proven by Swedish scientists at Lund University.

The researchers caught six wild butterflies in the meadows around Stensoffa, in southern Sweden, and analysed how these butterflies flew using powerful high-speed video cameras and a wind tunnel.

The researchers also examined what role the creature’s flexible wings had in forming the cupped shape which enabled this jet to thrust them forward by developing mechanical clappers.

One of the two sets of clappers was rigid while the other was flexible, similar to the butterfly wings.

They found the flexible wings significantly increased the force of the clap and improved the efficiency of the wingbeat by 28% – an enormous improvement for a flying animal.

“Our measurements show that the impulse created by the flexible wings is 22% higher and the efficiency 28% better compared to if the wings had been rigid,” said author Dr Christoffer Johansson.

“That the wings are cupped when butterflies clap them together, makes the wing stroke much more effective,” said biology researcher Dr Per Henningsson, who studied the butterflies’ aerodynamics with Dr Johansson.

“It is an elegant mechanism that is far more advanced than we imagined, and it is fascinating. The butterflies benefit from the technique when they have to take off quickly to escape from predators,” Dr Henningsson added.

Continue Reading

Tech

Gary Numan: ‘One of my songs got over a million streams – I got £37’ | Ents & Arts News

Published

on

Nile Rodgers at the premiere of Cats at the Lincoln Center in New York CIty in 2019. Pic:John Nacion/STAR MAX/IPx/AP

Gary Numan has told Sky News he received just £37 for a hit that had been streamed more than a million times, as an inquiry into the economics of digital music services continues.

The British singer-songwriter, best known for hits including Are ‘Friends’ Electric?, Cars and We Are Glass in the 1970s and 80s, has sold millions of records over the years and is set to release his 18th solo studio album, Intruder, in May.

With artist revenue from touring obliterated by the COVID-19 pandemic, platforms such as Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music and Google Play have come under increased scrutiny in the past 12 months and are currently being looked into by a department of culture, media, and sport committee (DCMS) inquiry.

Image:
Nile Rodgers is among several artists who have appeared at an inquiry into streaming. Pic:John Nacion/STAR MAX/IPx/AP

On Wednesday, executives from the UK’s “big three” major labels – Sony Music, Warner Music and Universal Music – as well as representatives from licensing bodies, appeared before MPs for the third session of the hearing, which has already seen artists such as Elbow frontman Guy Garvey, Radiohead guitarist Ed O’Brien, Chic’s Nile Rodgers and singer-songwriter Nadine Shah give evidence.

The label heads told MPs their cut from streaming was a fair reward for the risks involved in developing artists, recording, marketing and distribution.

Numan is not appearing at the inquiry, but gave his thoughts on the revenue from streaming in an interview with Sky News – putting the figures into context.

“The solution’s simple,” he said. “The streaming companies should pay more money. They’re getting it for nothing.

“I had a statement a while back and one of my songs had had over a million plays, million streams, and it was £37. I got £37 from a million streams.”

Giving another example, Numan continued: “I printed out, I think it was about a year ago, a statement – my streaming statement came in and I didn’t look at it, I just put it to print, and I looked over about half an hour later, it was still printing.

“It was hundreds and hundreds of pages. And the end of it was, like, £112. It was barely worth the [paper] it was printed on, and it took nearly half an hour to print. You know, it’s so much stuff, so much streaming, and there’s absolutely nothing in it.”

Streaming currently accounts for more than half of the global music industry’s revenue and brings more than £1 billion to the UK in revenue, with 114 billion music streams in the last year.

But according to the Broken Record campaign, artists receive around 16% of the total income from streams, while record companies get around 41% and streaming services around 29%.

Numan said that very big artists can do well from streaming, but smaller artists struggle.

“If you’re really at the top, then you can earn pretty well from streaming,” he said. “If you’re not, you might as well forget it, it isn’t even worth printing it out, printing out the statement.”

The star’s words were echoed during the latest DCMS session by Peter Leathem, chief executive of music copyright collective Phonographic Performance Ltd, who said: “If you look at 2019, the best-selling albums were Queen, Bohemian Rhapsody, based on the film, and Abbey Road by the Beatles, its 50-year anniversary.

“If you are trying to break a new artist or trying to get your own streaming going you have got the last 50 years of the music industry to compete with.”

:: Subscribe to the Backstage podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

But Tony Harlow, chief executive of Warner Music UK, cautioned against disrupting the system.

“This is an evolving situation,” he said. “It is being well-governed by a market that is efficient and nimble and it doesn’t need any change.

“Any disruptions could diminish UK competitiveness at a time when I feel the UK needs to be the home of recorded music, just as it is by providing one in 10 streams around the world, by being the number two export business.”

During the session, it was suggested that major labels were operating like an “oligopoly” – to which Jason Iley, chairman and chief executive of Sony Music UK and Ireland, replied: “The independent sector is a brilliant sector and signs some of the best acts.

“There is more opportunity for artists to either sign to a major label or sign to an independent label or distribute their own records. There are more avenues today than I have ever seen in my time doing this job.”

Continue Reading

Trending