Connect with us

Living

California university offers to pay would-be spring breakers $75 not to travel

Published

on

California university offers to pay would-be spring breakers $75 not to travel

Students at the University of California, Davis, can earn a $75 grant if they agree to stay in town for spring break.

According to a Facebook post from UC Davis, the Healthy Davis Together Spring Break Grants will be awarded to 500 applicants.

UC Davis spokesperson Melissa Blouin told Fox News that applications are being accepted through March 10, and that so far interest has been strong. 

“The purpose of this $75 grant is to encourage UC Davis students not to travel during spring break and provide them with alternative activities to do during the week,” Blouin explained. “This is an opportunity for students to create a memorable experience for the people they live with or are connected to virtually.” 

The grant options include the Get Active Grant, the Get Artsy Grant, the Home Improvement Grant, and the Let’s Stay In Grant. The grants must be redeemed at select Davis businesses during the university’s spring break from March 22 to 26. Students must provide proof of identity when redeeming the grant. 

Grant applications can be accessed through UC Davis students’ Google accounts here. 

Applicants must be currently registered UC Davis students living full-time in Davis, California, and who are staying for the college’s spring break. In addition, applicants must have a COVID-19 test scheduled during spring break. 

Meanwhile, those who choose to travel out of state will have to quarantine for 10 days after returning, per state guidelines. UC Davis recommends that students get tested every three to four days before and after their trip.

The incentive from UC Davis comes as colleges around the US are scaling back spring break or canceling it entirely to discourage partying that could spread the coronavirus and raise infection rates back on campus.

Texas A&M University opted for a three-day weekend instead of a whole week off. The University of Alabama and the University of Wisconsin-Madison also did away with spring break but are giving students a day off later in the semester. The University of Mississippi, which canceled spring break, said it will end the semester a week early. 

The United States has surpassed 29 million COVID-19 cases and 527,000 related deaths, according to the latest data from Johns Hopkins University. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that over 93.6 million COVID-19 vaccines have been administered in the United States as of Tuesday.  

The Associated Press contributed to this report

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Living

Here’s which animals Americans think they can beat in a fight

Published

on

By

Here's which animals Americans think they can beat in a fight

They say you should never poke a bear, but an overly confident 6% of Americans would.

A new online survey by YouGov — which appears to serve no higher purpose than to entertain — has revealed that, despite our reputation for arrogance, Americans are surprisingly realistic when it comes to fantasy match-ups pitting humans against beasts.

The ridiculous statistic, taken from a poll of 1,224 US adults aged 18 and over, asked participants to answer the query “Which animal do you think would win in a fight?” — humans included. The survey asked each volunteer to select one of two animals in a hypothetical head-to-head and answer seven rounds of pairings.

It should come as no surprise that the mighty elephant and fierce rhinoceros won out against more than 30 other predators and prey 74% of the time, securing their title as true rulers of the wild — at least, from humans’ perspective.

Grizzly bears got third billing (73%), then tigers (70%) and, in fifth place, the hippopotamus (69%) — who beat out some of the most agile hunters in all the animal kingdom, including the lion (68%) and a number of other big cats. It’s an astute assessment as the hippo, clocking in at about three tons, is widely considered to be one of the world’s deadliest animals, and kills some 500 people each year in Africa alone.

What followed is a pretty typical cast of ferocious characters, like the crocodile (67%) or the alligator (65%); the gorilla and the polar bear (each 64%). Notably raging reptiles — the anaconda, King Cobra and the Komodo dragon — all had strong showings. Even a few ruminants — the buffalo, bull and moose — were highly regarded.

Geese were considered the least of all formidable animals, winning just 14% of the time. Humans came next with 17%. Even a honey badger (37%) got more backing than us.

Survey data was also reorganized to reflect how humans ranked themselves against all other animals. Turns out we showed a healthy fear for some of the most savage beasts in more than 90% of match-ups, including against crocs, gorillas, elephants and lions.

Nearly half of us think we could take down a mid-sized dog, while just 23% would clash with a large canine. (In reality, dogs are more blight than bite: Rabies caused by feral dog bites kill tens of thousands globally per year, according to the World Health Organization, whereas, last year in the US, just 36 people died from injuries caused by dogs.) And put us in front of a rat, house cat or common landfowl and folks will put their money on our species about two-thirds of the time.

However, there’s one animal the survey didn’t name that deserves a nod: the mosquito. They may seem easy to squash, but the humble insect is responsible for more human deaths — hundreds of thousands — than any other animal, according to the Centers for Disease Control. Probably because, well, who could see them coming?

Continue Reading

Living

Dad throws baby fit at pink gender reveal party

Published

on

By

Dad throws baby fit at pink gender reveal party

A father-to-be proved himself the biggest baby at his future child’s gender reveal. 

A viral TikTok video from this spring has captured the moment a dad learned that his unborn kid will be a girl — a fact he seems not very happy about.

While the rest of the crowd present erupts in cheers as a pregnant woman pops a balloon covered in question marks — that proves to be filled with smaller pink balloons, revealing that the woman will be having a daughter — the father has quite a different reaction. “Son of a bitch,” he appears to scream, throwing down the balloon’s strings in frustration and turning away from the party guests, all smiling but him.

The video, which was posted on April 25, has racked up over 566,000 views on the platform. 

The reaction is certainly not the best, but other recent gender reveals have gone up in far bigger flames.

Earlier in April, a particularly rambunctious gender reveal in New Hampshire shook homes in neighboring towns, was felt across state lines and prompted earthquake concerns, because it caused such a huge blast. It turns out, revelers had detonated 80 pounds of Tannerite to celebrate the fact that the baby was a boy. 

“We heard this God-awful blast,” neighbor Sara Taglieri told NBC 10 Boston. “It knocked pictures off our walls . . . I’m all up for silliness and whatnot, but that was extreme.”

Other notably intense gender reveal incidents have involved an Australian driver using color-infused rubber tires for (explosive) burnouts, a Tennessee couple using handheld colored smoke cannons and a gender reveal in Iowa that launched lethal shrapnel.

The woman behind the fad has begged people to be safer.

“For the love of God, stop burning things down to tell everyone about your kid’s penis. No one cares but you,” the parenting blogger credited with inventing the baby-reveal trend wrote last year. “

Continue Reading

Living

Diver spots fish wearing a gold wedding ring in Australia

Published

on

By

Diver spots fish wearing a gold wedding ring in Australia

One man’s treasure is a fish’s trash.

A common mullet fish was spotted in the southern Pacific Ocean looking like a thousand bucks — by reasonable estimates.

Earlier this week, travel writer and avid snorkeler Susan Prior, who lives on Australia’s Norfolk Island, shared images of a silvery mullet fish, no more than a few inches long, with a gold wedding band wrapped around its head.

Prior is used to seeing these tiny fish sporting similar collars, usually made of plastic, which likely come from discarded “plastic juice and milk bottles,” she said, which so often end up in the ocean.

“Sometimes these rings escape into the wild, and this is the sad consequence,” Prior said in a May 11 blog post on her website.

But one mullet recently caught her eye for its particularly flashy new accessory.

“This one looked a shiny metallic gold, with a lot less algal growth compared to the plastic ones,” she wrote, referring to past mullets she’s seen with a similar look.

Although it’s certainly not uncommon for swimmers to lose their rings in the water, Prior also remembered that someone from Norfolk Island had in fact lost their gold band recently.

“I recalled that someone had posted on our local community social media pages about a large man’s wedding ring that had gone missing in the bay earlier this year, so I decided to see if I could find the possible owner,” she explained. “It didn’t take long for my suspicion to be confirmed; we now have a poor mullet weighed down with someone’s (expensive) gold wedding ring.”

However, she was unable to return the ring since she couldn’t catch up to the fish. According to Prior, who takes daily swims in the ocean, mullets are uniquely susceptible to picking up rings.

“Mullet snuffle through the sand looking for food, making it so easy for a ring or hair tie to flip over their noses and get stuck,” she wrote.

The amateur underwater photographer also pointed out that, valuable or not, these fish are being hampered by the added weight and algal growth, and at risk of being “slowly strangled,” she wrote. “The mullet has a life to live and it’s only fair he gets to live it.”

She also reminded her readers that, if we can’t keep trash from settling on the seabed, we can at the very least take steps to prevent harm to marine life.

“It is such a quick job to [pry] the collar off the bottle and snip it before putting it in your waste,” she wrote.

Continue Reading

Trending