Marvin Rees mentioned the statue of the slave trader shall be displayed alongside Black Lives Matter placards from the latest protest “so the 300-year-story of slavery by to immediately’s combat for racial equality could be discovered about”.
A fee of historians and different consultants may also analysis and share Bristol’s “true historical past” following the elimination of the statue, Mr Rees mentioned.
“The occasions over the previous couple of days have actually highlighted that as a metropolis all of us have very completely different understandings of our previous,” Mr Rees mentioned in an announcement.
“The one manner we are able to work collectively on our future is by studying the reality of our beginnings, embracing the information, and sharing these tales with others. For this reason this fee is so essential.”
Mr Rees, the UK’s first straight elected black mayor, added: “Training of our historical past has usually been flawed.
“Extra accuracy of our metropolis’s historical past which is accessible to all will assist us perceive one another, our variations, our contradictions and our complexities.”
Any choice on the way forward for the plinth on which the statue stood shall be “determined democratically by session”, the mayor mentioned.
Mr Rees beforehand described the tearing down of the statue as an “iconic second” after it was pulled down and dragged by the streets, earlier than being thrown within the harbour.
A protracted-running marketing campaign within the metropolis has argued that Colston’s “poisonous” legacy shouldn’t be commemorated, and his statue ought to be eliminated.
Campaigners have additionally known as for College of Bristol halls of residence named after the dealer to be renamed.
Protest organiser Liza Bilal, a 21-year-old scholar, told the Standard her team had not originally planned for the statue to be torn down – however welcomed it.
“This was lengthy overdue,” she mentioned. “The council not listening to the folks of Bristol resulted on this – the folks themselves tearing the statue down.”
Ms Bilal mentioned the inclusion of protesters’ placards in any museum exhibit could be ” reflection on the truth that the folks of Bristol have a voice and have the facility to vary this metropolis”.
She additionally insisted any museum putting for Colston’s statue would “solely be acceptable if the outline connected acknowledged his previous as a slave dealer, for the aim of training folks”.
House Secretary Priti Patel has known as the tearing down of the statue “completely disgraceful” and known as for a full investigation.
She is reported to have had a “agency” dialogue with Andy Marsh, chief constable of Avon and Somerset Police, about why officers didn’t intervene when the statue was torn down.
However Mr Marsh has insisted there was “no lack of braveness” when his officers made the tactical choice, describing how the bronze memorial was pulled down in simply two minutes.
He advised a Fb Dwell occasion with Sue Mountstevens, Avon and Somerset’s police and crime commissioner, that intervening risked a “violent confrontation”.
He mentioned: “Had they intervened, I feel the implications may have been extremely critical and we would have turn out to be the epicentre of a brand new wave of protests round the entire world, by no means thoughts what would have occurred in Bristol.
“They determined to not. Now we have acquired large quantities of CCTV and social media footage of who’s accountable.
“They made the choice that post-incident, the lengthy arm of the regulation, so to talk, may meet up with these folks and produce them to justice and our targets, defending life and property, have been higher served by not intervening.
“I feel they acted with widespread sense, sound judgement. There was no lack of braveness.”
Mr Marsh mentioned the power would perform a “painstaking” evaluate of the footage, interview suspects and current a case to the Crown Prosecution Service “as shortly as doable”.