Connect with us

Tech

Behold the 3D-printed, cruelty-free ribeye steak

Published

on

Behold the 3D-printed, cruelty-free ribeye steak

The burgeoning lab-grown meat industry has made its first foray into fine dining with an artificially forged rib-eye steak — a cut that can run hundreds of dollars in some restaurants.

This cruelty-free counterpart however could go for as low as $50 when it hits dining areas as early as next year, according to the Daily Mail.

The new dish, created by Israeli food laboratory Aleph Farms, marks the world’s first 3-D bio-printed rib-eye made with real cow tissue, despite the fact that no live animals were hurt or killed in the process. The breakthrough follows the company’s initial leap into the lab-grown meat industry in 2018, when they debuted the first-ever slaughter-free steak, though 3-D printing was not used at that time.

Israel’s food science industry has pioneered the lab meat industry as of late, with food science companies such as Aleph — who also recently grew meat in space — as well as Future Meat Technologies and Redefine Meat developing cruelty-free alternatives within the nation’s borders.

The process of printing meat may begin with plant-based ingredients, or, in the case of Aleph’s steak, real bovine cells that have been cloned and cultivated in a lab setting.

The four primary cells that make up meat — muscle tissue, fat, blood and support cells — create the “ink” used to print the steak.

“We recognize some consumers will crave thicker and fattier cuts of meat,” said Aleph’s CEO Didier Toubia, in a statement to the Daily Mail. “This accomplishment represents our commitment to meeting our consumer’s unique preferences and taste buds, and we will continue to progressively diversify our offerings.”

Toubia anticipates the rib-eye could arrive in supermarkets during the next two to three years, pending US Department of Agriculture inspection and approval.

“We are executing a clear plan to achieve cost-parity for cultivation of meat products at scale,” Toubia also said.

“We expect to achieve this goal within five years from our 2022 soft launch, which is faster than the new generation of plant-based meat substitutes,” he said, in a reference to market rivals Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat, which rely on ingredients from plants to design a meat-like product.

The news of Aleph’s forthcoming 3-D printed and other artificially grown steaks comes several weeks after American startup Eat Just announced their pilot launch of lab-cultured chicken in Singapore.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

Judge approves $650M Facebook privacy lawsuit settlement

Published

on

By

Judge approves $650M Facebook privacy lawsuit settlement

SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge on Friday approved a $650 million settlement of a privacy lawsuit against Facebook for allegedly using photo face-tagging and other biometric data without the permission of its users.

U.S. District Judge James Donato approved the deal in a class-action lawsuit that was filed in Illlinois in 2015. Nearly 1.6 million Facebook users in Illinois who submitted claims will be affected.

Donato called it one of the largest settlements ever for a privacy violation.

“It will put at least $345 into the hands of every class member interested in being compensated,” he wrote, calling it “a major win for consumers in the hotly contested area of digital privacy.”

Jay Edelson, a Chicago attorney who filed the lawsuit, told the Chicago Tribune that the checks could be in the mail within two months unless the ruling is appealed.

“We are pleased to have reached a settlement so we can move past this matter, which is in the best interest of our community and our shareholders,” Facebook, which is headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area, said in a statement.

The lawsuit accused the social media giant of violating an Illinois privacy law by failing to get consent before using facial-recognition technology to scan photos uploaded by users to create and store faces digitally.

The state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act allowed consumers to sue companies that didn’t get permission before harvesting data such as faces and fingerprints.

The case eventually wound up as a class-action lawsuit in California.

Facebook has since changed its photo-tagging system.

Continue Reading

Tech

Facebook weighs adding facial recognition to smart glasses

Published

on

By

Facebook weighs adding facial recognition to smart glasses

Facebook is weighing whether to add facial recognition technology to the smart glasses it’s developing, one top executive says.

The tech titan plans to have a public discussion about the feature’s “pros and cons” in light of the ethical concerns it raises, according to Andrew Bosworth, the head of the company’s virtual and augmented reality division.

“It’s really a debate we need to have with the public,” Bosworth said during a Thursday Q&A on his Instagram page. “If people don’t want this technology, we don’t have to supply it. The product’s going to be fine either way.”

Bosworth spoke up publicly after BuzzFeed News reported that Facebook was examining whether it could legally build facial recognition features into the high-tech glasses it’s planning to roll out later this year.

During a company meeting on Thursday, one Facebook employee asked whether people could “mark their faces as unsearchable” when smart glasses become widely used given fears about the technology leading to “real-world harm,” according to the outlet.

In addition to those concerns, current state laws may prevent Facebook from allowing people who use its glasses to look up others based on images of their faces, Bosworth reportedly said in the meeting.

He noted on Twitter that facial recognition is a “hugely controversial topic and for good reason,” but said the technology has some good practical uses “if it could be done in a way the public and regulators were comfortable with.”

For instance, he said, it could help people who have prosopagnosia, a neurological condition that prevents them from recognizing others’ faces.

“More general is the party use case where you see someone you recognize but can’t place their name,” Bosworth tweeted. “Is it a huge deal? Of course not. But might be nice if you could have your memory jogged.”

Facebook is reportedly developing its smart glasses to rival similar wearable gadgets made by Snapchat and Amazon. They’re being built in partnership with the Ray-Ban specs brand and its parent company, Luxottica.

Continue Reading

Tech

Bots hyped GameStop on major social media platforms: analysis

Published

on

By

Bots hyped GameStop on major social media platforms: analysis

Bots on major social media platforms have been hyping up GameStop and other “meme” stocks, according to an analysis by Massachusetts-based cybersecurity company PiiQ Media, suggesting organized economic or foreign actors may have played a role in the Reddit-driven trading frenzy.

Shares in GameStop soared last month after Reddit users banded together to squeeze hedge funds that had bet against the video game retailer and other companies. Reddit Chief Executive Steve Huffman told Congress this month that bots, artificial or fake accounts with automated content, had not played a “significant role” in GameStop Reddit message traffic.

PiiQ Media’s analysis of Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube posts, however, found that bots used the platforms to push GameStop and other “meme” stocks, although it is unclear how influential they were in the overall saga.

A startup that focuses on social media risks, PiiQ said it examined patterns of keywords such as “Hold the Line” and GameStop’s stock symbol, “GME” across conversations and profiles prior to the Jan. 28 frenzy, through Feb. 18. For comparison, it also assessed posts on an unrelated set of stocks.

PiiQ said that it identified very similar daily “start and stop patterns” in the GameStop-related posts, with activity starting at the beginning of the trading day, followed by a large spike at the end of the trading day. Such patterns are indicative of bots, said Aaron Barr, co-founder and chief technology officer of PiiQ.

“We saw clear patterns of artificial behavior across the other four social media platforms. When you think of organic content, it’s variable in the day, variable day-to-day. It doesn’t have the exact same pattern every day for a month,” he said.

Based on its authenticity scoring system, PiiQ estimates there are tens of thousands of bot accounts hyping GameStop, the meme stocks, and Dogecoin, a cryptocurrency swept up in the frenzy. Thousands of fake accounts can be purchased for as little as $200, it said.

The company did not analyze Reddit data, but Barr said he would expect to see a similar pattern of activity on Reddit, indicating bot-like or coordinated management of conversations.

A representative for Reddit did not comment beyond Huffman’s testimony. Representatives for YouTube, Facebook and its Instagram subsidiary did not respond to requests for comment. The social media platforms generally try to weed out harmful bots, said Barr.

A spokesperson for Twitter said that “bots” had become a catch-all term that can often mischaracterize the nature of the account. The company notes bots can be used on its platform for creative or innovative purposes.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is probing the GameStop saga, and this month suspended trading in a handful of companies because some “social media accounts may be engaged in a coordinated attempt to artificially influence” their stocks.

In addition to traders, organized criminals may use social media to stoke asset prices, and undermining the integrity of U.S. markets is a known goal of hostile state actors, said Barr. But it is unclear how successful, if at all, these types of influence efforts are, he said.

“Measuring the effect of those campaigns is often illusive.”

Continue Reading

Trending